site stats

Coronation Street: Who's looking after the kids?

Comments (2)

Just a couple of weeks ago we expressed concern about the welfare of the kids of (then) warring couple Dev and Sunita Alahan. They were rowing in the street, Sunita got arrested and Dev went drinking in the Rovers. No-one, it seems, was looking after their children.paula lane.jpg

Now it's Max's turn to go missing. Last night David and Kylie's marriage troubles worsened and Kylie packed a bag and left. She, David and Gail heatedly debated the situation for a while but at no point did anyone mention the couple's son.

'What about Max?' would surely be any responsible person's question? But the Platt's don't seem to remember that they have a small child secreted somewhere about the house.

I wonder how many of the writers or producers of the show are parents? A few of them must be. So why does no-one point out these plot holes sometime before the cameras roll? Leaving kids without supervision would cause a lot of fuss if the whole thing wasn't a made-up TV show - which (we must constantly remind ourselves) it is.

Join Corrieblog on Facebook for exclusive competitions and gossip

Go to TV Scoop for all the latest TV entertainment news, reviews and gossip

  • Gail

    I often wonder that exact thing.  Kevin (here in Canada) is constantly propping up the bar in the Rovers after work who is looking after baby Jack (who we never see anymore).  Also Fizz is supposedly going back to work for Carla who is going to look after Hope?  The only person on the street who has proper paid for childcare is Kevin.  Everyone else seems to dump their kids on relatives and neighbours for free!  Drives me nuts!  Parents and the grandparents in the pub and who is minding the kids!

  • Pendergrastsmith

    This Girl is Looking different after the Kids.
     http://lossyourweighthere.word...

blog comments powered by Disqus
©2013 Shiny Digital Privacy Policy